Paths To Knowledge (dot Science)

What is actually real in Objective Reality? How do you know? Now, prove it's real!

Mannian Global Warming Climate Scientists Exposed as Scientific Fraud Artists? | Climategate

Posted by pwl on November 22, 2009

Homerian Wisdom tells the tale of the shifting perception.

That’s a subtle way of putting it Homer. The inside tip of course are the Climate Research Unit (CRU)’s released emails. They were either released by (1) a hacker, (2) incompetence leaving the internally collected Freedom of Information (FOI) Requested information on a public server, or (3) a whistler blower intentionally leaving it on a public server.

Of course Al’s still at his game setting up his corporate pieces to position himself so that he can make billions in various ventures such as Carbon Credit Trading and other investments opened due to his propaganda now shown to have been based upon falsified and “mannipulated” techniques.

The entire basis for Al Gore’s claims using the infamous hockey stick graph has suspected of being based upon fraudulent science for some time. NOW there is evidence to back up these suspicions. As close to a smoking gun as you can get!

This is not a smoking gun, this is a mushroom cloud.” – Climatologist Patrick J. Michaels on the CRU Files.

To quote the immortal word of Homer Simpson, “Doh!”.

This is a potentially a very serious issue should these charges be proven. Should criminal charges be laid against Dr. Mann and members his close inbred network of 40 or more climate scientists who very possibly manipulated the data to achieve political and career ends and in the process distorted science with fraudulent activities? Certainly it’s unethical science that has been conducted. Time will tell who goes to jail or has their career in science ended for their role in doing the alleged fraudulent climate science of Dr. Mann and his cohorts.

“This is horrible,” said Pat Michaels, a climate scientist at the Cato Institute in Washington who is mentioned negatively in the emails. “This is what everyone feared. Over the years, it has become increasingly difficult for anyone who does not view global warming as an end-of-the-world issue to publish papers. This isn’t questionable practice, this is unethical.

Phil Jones, the director of the East Anglia climate center, suggested to climate scientist Michael Mann of Penn State University that skeptics’ research was unwelcome: We “will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!” Neither man could be reached for comment Sunday.”
Wall Street Journal

“Retired climatologist Dr. Tim Ball was interviewed to discuss the significance of the recently leaked emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University.”

Apparently the alarmist climatologists acknowledge that SO2, frequently emitted in conjunction with CO2, nullifies, wholly or in part, any warming tendency associated with the CO2. What is the net effect? This is, obviously, an empirical, quantitative question. But these scientists can’t answer it, not only because each of their models gives a different answer, but because they have no idea how much SO2 is being emitted by the main countries that produce that pollutant, India and China. Having no idea what the facts are, their models are useless. It does appear, however, that one obvious alternative to impoverishing humanity in a most-likely-futile effort to stave off global warming would be emitting a whole lot of SO2 over the ocean, and continuing those emissions indefinitely rather than banning them as is currently contemplated by the warmists’ models.

Climate science is in its infancy, and every proposition is controversial. What climate scientists like those at East Anglia don’t know dwarfs what they do know. They can produce a model for every occasion, but are the models any good? If so, which one? One thing we know for sure is that they don’t generate reliable predictions. In every scientific field other than global warming, a scientific hypothesis that generates false predictions is considered disproved. When it comes to global warming, however, there is no such thing as falsification. Which is the ultimate evidence that the alarmist scientists are engaged in a political enterprise, not a scientific one.WUWT+POWERLINE

The CRU Files reveal earth shattering news should the alleged CRU emails and data files prove to be authentic. See them for yourself. So far there have been no denials that they have been faked and a number of acknowledgments that they (some of them anyhow) are authentic. Download the alleged CRU data files via a torrent client from any of these sites via this google search for

The reporter in this following tv report attempts to present both sides of the CRU Files point of view. However, it should be noted that reading the actual emails and looking at the other documents is the best way to judge for yourself. I find the evidence in the emails damming especially given the context of the cost of trillions of dollars to retool civilization based upon Doctor Mann et. al.s obviously falsified and “mannipulated hockey stick” data.

Surprisingly even Glenn Beck has an accurate assessment of this issue, very well spoken for a change and sticking to the facts.

A US Senate Investigation is likely underway on the UN IPCC and how they cooked the science and said the science was settled when now we know it wasn’t.

An excellent interview.

In the following video “Stuart Varney interviews scientist Pat Michaels, with the CATO institute, who was the target of physical threat from Climate Scientist Ben Sanders. He also DESTROYS Ben Weiss, from the Center for American Progress.” It’s interesting that the quotes that Ben Weiss brings out are all based upon the works – now in disrepute – of the Climategate science criminals and as such are highly dubious at best. If there is a mountain of scientific evidence Ben Weiss sure isn’t speaking any of it.

Good summaries to date from YouTubbers.

Al Gore refusing to engage in basic questions.

The numbers of Polar Bears is increasing. Answer the question Mr. Gore.

Make no mistake about it, to polar bears we are food. Period.

Is the real aim of the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen the politics of The New World Order and the total control and taxation of your energy choices and consumption? It may be.

Ode to the (1) Hackers for Freedom Of Information, (2) Incompetent CRU Staff, (3) Whistleblowers everywhere and every when.

3 Responses to “Mannian Global Warming Climate Scientists Exposed as Scientific Fraud Artists? | Climategate”

  1. Ahaa, its fastidious conversation on the topic of this
    piece of writing here at this web site, I have read all that, so
    at this time me also commenting at this place.

  2. Good day I am so thrilled I found your blog page, I really found you by error, while I was browsing on Google for something else,
    Regardless I am here now and would just like to
    say many thanks for a marvelous post and a all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design),
    I don’t have time to read through it all at the minute
    but I have book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds,
    so when I have time I will be back to read more,
    Please do keep up the awesome jo.

  3. I do consider all of the ideas you have offered to your post.
    They’re really convincing and can definitely work. Still, the posts are very brief for starters.
    Could you please prolong them a little from subsequent time?
    Thank you for the post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: